Joan’s House Has Been Saved!

Some stories reaffirm my faith in humanity. This is one of them. Two weeks ago, I wrote about a neighbor who was about to lose her home. Once her friends found out about this, they created a website seeking donations. Through charity of Joan’s friends, neighbors, and strangers – enough money was raised to bring … Read more

Only In Connecticut….

These are your laws. I can’t make this stuff up. Here’s how our legislature defines who is a skier: “Skier” shall include the following: …a person utilizing the passenger tramway whether or not that person is a skier, including riders on a passenger tramway operating during the nonskiing season.  Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec. 29-201(e)(2). As ski season is … Read more

Two Outstanding Law Related Podcasts

I love the podcast. My two favorite podcasts are: “NPR’s Planet Money” and “This American Life”. If you’re looking for something to listen to, check out these two episodes: “A Former Crack Dealer on The Economics Of Drugs”: My favorite thing about economics is that when done well it tells the truth about human behavior. … Read more

What Would You Tell A Law School Class of 2011?

On May 21, 2011, I’ll again stand before a graduating law school class. This time as President of the school’s alumni association. Having sat through many a graduation speech, I will keep this one very short. Probably about 2.5 minutes. No one is there to hear me. Plus, I really like short speeches. Maybe I should tweet it and keep it to 140 characters. So I’ll ask you, my enlightened readers, what would you say to the graduating class of 2011?

Save Joan’s House

Joan’s house sits at the bottom of a big hill. It’s a hill that I’ve ran up and down – hundreds of times. Sometimes, I see Joan. She may be sitting on her porch or gardening. We usually wave and say “hi” to each other.  I continue up the hill. She goes on with her … Read more

Thoughts On “The Bysiewicz Bill”

The Courant’s Daniela Altimari is reporting that the Judiciary Committee is going to take up a bill that would alter the requirements to serve as attorney general. Last year, in Bysiewicz v. DiNardo the Connecticut Supreme Court found that a candidate for attorney general must have 10 years of practice with at least some of it being litigation and perhaps trial practice.

The Court left open the question of how much experience was necessary and just concluded that Bysiewicz who admitted to having no litigation experience did not meet the statutory requirements.  Thus, the Court provided little guidance to anyone seeking the office in the future just how much experience one needed to qualify.

This inevitably leads to wasteful and stupid litigation. See Dean v. Jepsen.

Read moreThoughts On “The Bysiewicz Bill”