<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Connecticut Law Blog &#187; susan bysiew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/susan-bysiew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Connecticut&#039;s Widely Read Obscure Legal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bysiewicz to Seek Declaratory Judgment on AG Statute? A Showdown With Blumenthal In Court Likely.</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/02/bysiewicz-to-square-off-with-blumenthal-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/02/bysiewicz-to-square-off-with-blumenthal-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general statute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dick blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin rennie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan bysiew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan bysiewicz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ryan McKeen
Kevin Rennie is reporting that Susan Bysiewicz is going to seek a declaratory judgment on the issue as to whether or not she is qualified to be attorney general.
If she  opts to challenge the constitutionality of the Attorney General statute she&#8217;ll find herself squaring off against Attorney General Blumenthal.
Connecticut Practice Book Section 17-56b [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Ryan McKeen</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailyructions.com/fasten-your-motions-and-grab-your-briefs/comment-page-1/#comment-113">Kevin Rennie</a> is reporting that Susan Bysiewicz is going to seek a declaratory judgment on the issue as to whether or not she is qualified to be attorney general.</p>
<p>If she  opts to challenge the constitutionality of the Attorney General statute she&#8217;ll find herself squaring off against Attorney General Blumenthal.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jud.ct.gov/Publications/PracticeBook/PB_2010.pdf#page=234">Connecticut Practice Book Section 17-56b</a> requires the Attorney General to be given reasonable notice or be  a party to any declaratory judgment challenging the validity of a state statute.</p>
<p>If the statute is challenged it&#8217;s the Attorney General&#8217;s job to defend it.</p>
<p>Break out the popcorn.  Bysiewicz v. Blumenthal may be coming to a superior court near you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/02/bysiewicz-to-square-off-with-blumenthal-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
