<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; legal services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/legal-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Malloy Does Not Propose Tax On Legal Services</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/02/malloy-does-not-propose-tax-on-legal-services/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/02/malloy-does-not-propose-tax-on-legal-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct sales tax exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raise taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m almost hesitant to write this out of fear they just forgot to do so. In yesterday&#8217;s budget address, Governor Malloy made it clear that state taxes will increase.  The remaining questions for the legislature are really the amount of &#8230; <a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/02/malloy-does-not-propose-tax-on-legal-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost hesitant to write this out of fear they just forgot to do so.</p>
<p>In yesterday&#8217;s budget address, Governor Malloy made it clear that state taxes will increase.  The remaining questions for the legislature are really the amount of the increases and where the increases will occur.</p>
<p>Fortunately, at least under Malloy&#8217;s proposal (which isn&#8217;t law), <a href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/upload/Malloy-Tax-Proposal.pdf">legal services will remain tax free</a>.  For my clients it means that their bills won&#8217;t be higher. For our bookkeeper, it&#8217;s one less thing to keep track of.</p>
<p>Shhhh&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/02/malloy-does-not-propose-tax-on-legal-services/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/02/malloy-does-not-propose-tax-on-legal-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On CT Probate Court Reform and Taxing Legal Services</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/02/thinking-outloud-on-ct-probate-court-reform-and-taxing-legal-services/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/02/thinking-outloud-on-ct-probate-court-reform-and-taxing-legal-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatorships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elder Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatorships connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct probate court reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Ryan McKeen I love those new light bulbs, you know, the spiral kind.  Their packaging tells me that I can save $120 a year or something if I replace my old fashioned light bulbs. Having changed out my bulbs &#8230; <a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/02/thinking-outloud-on-ct-probate-court-reform-and-taxing-legal-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Ryan McKeen</p>
<p>I love those new light bulbs, you know, the spiral kind.  Their packaging tells me that I can save $120 a year or something if I replace my old fashioned light bulbs. Having changed out my bulbs &#8211; they&#8217;re not kidding, I do save money on my monthly electric bill.</p>
<p>The problem is to save that money, I must first spend money on new bulbs.  If I didn&#8217;t have any money, I&#8217;d be stuck with my old bulbs which would cost me more money each month and I&#8217;d be poorer because of it.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 136px"><img title="Light Bulb" src="http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb105/rcmckeen/lightbulb.jpg" alt="Cool New Light Bulb" width="126" height="86" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cool New Light Bulb</p></div>
<p>The Hartford Courant does near weekly articles on how much our probate courts cost and how they&#8217;re nearly bankrupt.</p>
<p>One of the reasons probate courts operate at a deficit is conservatorships. If a person doesn&#8217;t have money the court appoints an attorney for the proposed conserved person and pays that attorney at a rate of $50 an hour. If the person is conserved, the court also pays a conservator $50 an hour to manage that person&#8217;s affairs.</p>
<p>One of the most effective ways to prevent a conservatorship proceeding is to execute a living will and power of attorney.  People often end up conserved because for one reason or another they fail to do any advanced planning.</p>
<p>Sometimes perceived cost is a reason people don&#8217;t see an attorney to do a living will or a power of attorney. </p>
<p>Consequently, our state pays more for conservatorships because people don&#8217;t do advanced planning.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like we&#8217;re running our state on old light bulbs. </p>
<p>What the legislature should consider is a tax credit on legal fees for people who do some advanced planning. </p>
<p>What the legislature is doing is considering a tax on legal services and raising the attorney occupational tax &#8211; both of which will result in a higher cost of legal services for residents of Connecticut.</p>
<p>Raising the cost of legal services for the middle class is about as short sighted as the state deciding to raise taxes on those cool new light bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/02/thinking-outloud-on-ct-probate-court-reform-and-taxing-legal-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

