<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; justice katz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/justice-katz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:12:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Santa Claus In Court</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/12/santa-claus-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/12/santa-claus-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dcf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal footnotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa claus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twas the night before christmas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incoming DCF commissioner Justice Katz found a way to work the &#8220;Twas the Night Before Christmas&#8221; into a Supreme Court case. In State v. Aponte, defense counsel evidently wasn&#8217;t in the Christmas spirit. At trial, counsel complained that the victim&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/12/santa-claus-in-court/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incoming DCF commissioner Justice Katz found a way to work the &#8220;Twas the Night Before Christmas&#8221; into a Supreme Court case.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 230px"><img title="santa" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/49/Jonathan_G_Meath_portrays_Santa_Claus.jpg/220px-Jonathan_G_Meath_portrays_Santa_Claus.jpg" alt="santa" width="220" height="308" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ho! Ho! Ho!</p></div>
<p>In <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2489793755066358962&amp;q=santa+claus&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=8004">State v. Aponte</a>, defense counsel evidently wasn&#8217;t in the Christmas spirit. At trial, counsel complained that the victim&#8217;s advocate &#8220;looked like Santa Claus there.&#8221;Defense counsel objected to the bag of toys being placed at the child&#8217;s feet, but did not object to the Barney doll the witness was holding. The trial court refused defense counsel&#8217;s request to remove the bag of toys, stating that it was &#8220;not going to disturb the &#8230; arrangements &#8230; that have been made to allow a minor child of these tender years to testify in a court of law.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any lawyer knows that the best parts of any case are explained in the footnotes of opinions and State v. Aponte does not disappoint in this regard.</p>
<p>Read the footnote below the jump&#8230;.</p>
<p><span id="more-2591"></span></p>
<p>Justice Katz, in footnote 1 of the case explained Santa:  &#8221;Also known as St. Nicholas, Santa Claus carries a bundle of toys as gifts to children. See generally C. Moore, The Night Before Christmas (Holiday House 1980 Ed.)&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/12/santa-claus-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Thought On Connecticut&#8217;s Divorce Laws</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/06/a-thought-on-connecticuts-divorce-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/06/a-thought-on-connecticuts-divorce-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice katz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Meade v. Pongonis (1991) an unreported decision from then Judge (and now Justice) Katz: Specifically, despite statutes designed to facilitate divorce and separation for persons who choose to end their marriages, the statutory framework, considered in its entirety, seeks to promote and preserve marriage as &#8230; <a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/06/a-thought-on-connecticuts-divorce-laws/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Meade v. Pongonis</span> (1991) an unreported decision from then Judge (and now Justice) Katz:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Specifically, despite statutes designed to facilitate <a name="SR;2300"></a><a name="SearchTerm"></a><span class="SearchTerm" title="SearchTerm">divorce</span> and separation for <a name="SR;2304"></a><a name="SearchTerm"></a><span class="SearchTerm" title="SearchTerm">persons</span> who choose to end their marriages, the statutory framework, considered in its entirety, seeks to promote and preserve marriage as an institution. </p>
<p>I never really looked at it that way but Justice Katz is right. Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/06/a-thought-on-connecticuts-divorce-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

