<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Connecticut Law Blog &#187; ct wine law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/ct-wine-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Connecticut&#039;s Widely Read Obscure Legal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why you can&#8217;t purchase &#8220;Two Buck Chuck&#8221; in Connecticut.</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/why-theres-no-two-buck-chuck-in-connecticut/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/why-theres-no-two-buck-chuck-in-connecticut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random CT Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct wine law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, it&#8217;s actually $3 Charles but that&#8217;s beside the point.
Two Buck Chuck is made by Charles Shaw and is exclusive to Trader Joe&#8217;s.
According to Trader Joe&#8217;s website &#8220;Two Buck Chuck&#8221; has become the nation&#8217;s best selling wines.  I love it. There&#8217;s always a case in my house.
Unfortunately, Lou Merloni&#8217;s home town of Framingham Massaschusetts is the closest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, it&#8217;s actually $3 Charles but that&#8217;s beside the point.</p>
<p>Two Buck Chuck is made by Charles Shaw and is exclusive to Trader Joe&#8217;s.</p>
<p>According to Trader Joe&#8217;s website &#8220;Two Buck Chuck&#8221; has become the nation&#8217;s best selling wines.  I love it. There&#8217;s always a case in my house.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Lou Merloni&#8217;s home town of Framingham Massaschusetts is the closest location for Connecticut residents to purchase this nectar of the gods.</p>
<p>Why are Connecticut residents deprived of two buck chuck? Because in Connecticut grocery stores are only permitted to sell beer. <a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2007/pub/Chap545.htm#Sec30-20.htm">Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec</a>. 30-20.</p>
<p>The legislature should immediately amend section 30-20 to allow supermarkets to sell wine. Doing so would allow Trader Joe&#8217;s to stock their shelves with two buck chuck.</p>
<p>Come on legislature, free the grapes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/why-theres-no-two-buck-chuck-in-connecticut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CT Legislative Update: A Wine Tasting Stimulus Bill</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/ct-legislative-update-a-wine-tasting-stimulus-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/ct-legislative-update-a-wine-tasting-stimulus-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct wine law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecticut Representative Andrew Fleischmann first came to my attention when he introduced a bill that would require movie theaters to publicize the actual start times of movies.  No more waiting through a seemingly endless string of commercials.
In these tough economic times, Connecticut residents are scrutinizing every dollar they spend. Even on important things like wine.
Representative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connecticut Representative <a href="http://www.housedems.ct.gov/Fleischmann/index.asp">Andrew Fleischmann</a> first came to my attention when he introduced a bill that would require movie theaters to publicize the actual start times of movies.  No more waiting through a seemingly endless string of commercials.</p>
<p>In these tough economic times, Connecticut residents are scrutinizing every dollar they spend. Even on important things like wine.</p>
<p>Representative Fleischmann is once again proposing legislation for the people.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s reasonable to want to taste wine before you buy a bottle. What tastes good to one person may not to another. It&#8217;s also reasonable for package store owners not to want to give away their wines. Especially, their expensive wines.</p>
<p>A happy medium would be to allow package store owners to charge for wine tastings and classes. </p>
<p>Enter <a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/TOB/H/2009HB-05221-R00-HB.htm">Proposed Bill No. 522</a> introduced by Representative Fleischmann which would allow package stores to charge for wine tastings and classes.</p>
<p>You may be saying that package stores can presently offer tastings at no charge and this bill is a bad thing. I&#8217;ll argue that you get what you pay for and allowing package stores to charge a fee for wine tastings may allow them to expand their offerings.</p>
<p>More wine tastings and classes with better wines will help expand the palate of Connecticut residents and help local package store owners.  It&#8217;s a win-win situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/01/ct-legislative-update-a-wine-tasting-stimulus-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
