<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Connecticut Law Blog &#187; ct real estate law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/ct-real-estate-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Connecticut&#039;s Widely Read Obscure Legal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tough Times Ahead For Real Estate Attorneys?</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/tough-times-ahead-for-real-estate-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/tough-times-ahead-for-real-estate-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct real estate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate attorneys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ryan McKeen
It seems that the music is about to stop for real estate attorneys yet again.
2009 was the year of the refi. With interest rates at historic lows it made sense for many homeowners to lock in fixed rate loans at rates at or near 5%.
While attorneys weren&#8217;t doing record numbers of purchases and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Ryan McKeen</p>
<p>It seems that the music is about to stop for real estate attorneys yet again.</p>
<p>2009 was the year of the refi. With interest rates at historic lows it made sense for many homeowners to lock in fixed rate loans at rates at or near 5%.</p>
<p>While attorneys weren&#8217;t doing record numbers of purchases and sales they were doing plenty of refinances.</p>
<p>Now this:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">U.S. residential mortgage originations will plunge 40 percent this year to the lowest level in a decade as home refinancing demand sinks with rising mortgage rates, the industry&#8217;s main trade group said.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Lenders will underwrite $1.28 trillion in home loans this year, down from $2.11 trillion in 2009, the Mortgage Bankers Association said in its annual forecast on Tuesday. That would be the lowest since $1.14 trillion in 2000. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1219492320100112">Reuters.</a></p>
<p>With interest rates expecting to rise in 2010 it makes sense that refinances will decrease.</p>
<p>Short of a &#8220;hot&#8221; real estate market it looks like 2010 might be a tough year for real estate attorneys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/tough-times-ahead-for-real-estate-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Condo Duplex A Conplex</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/05/condo-duplex-a-conplex/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/05/condo-duplex-a-conplex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random CT Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CT condo law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct real estate law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File this under things I never thought about.
In Connecticut there are condo complexes that are comprised entirely of two units. The street term for these condos are conplexs. One part condo and one part duplex.
These units would appear to the naked eye to be a duplex or a two family home.
Why do developers make these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File this under things I never thought about.</p>
<p>In Connecticut there are condo complexes that are comprised entirely of two units. The street term for these condos are conplexs. One part condo and one part duplex.</p>
<p>These units would appear to the naked eye to be a duplex or a two family home.</p>
<p>Why do developers make these units into condos?</p>
<p>The short answer is that it would be impossible from a title perspective to have seperate owners of a two family home. Which explains why two family homes that aren&#8217;t condos always have an owner and a tenant.</p>
<p>In order for a developer to sell two units instead of one &#8211; the developer can choose to make the units condos. Thus, two sales instead of one.</p>
<p>Needless to say, issues in a two person condo association can be conplex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/05/condo-duplex-a-conplex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
