<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Connecticut Law Blog &#187; ct evictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/ct-evictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Connecticut&#039;s Widely Read Obscure Legal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:32:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>If Property Is Owned Jointly Is The Consent Of All Owners Required To Evict A Tenant? The Answer Is &#8220;Maybe&#8221;.</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/11/if-property-is-owned-jointly-is-the-consent-of-all-owners-required-to-evict-a-tenant/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/11/if-property-is-owned-jointly-is-the-consent-of-all-owners-required-to-evict-a-tenant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord/Tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement to evict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct evictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct tenants rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple property owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ryan McKeen
According to Judge Abrams, the answer is that all owners of jointly owned property must join together to  commence an eviction action.  Greene v. Cabarrus, DN: NHSP-08-098865 (Abrams, J.)
Judge Abrams&#8217; ruling is consistent with Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 47a-23 which requires &#8220;the owner&#8221; to serve a notice to quit. In applying the law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Ryan McKeen</p>
<p>According to Judge Abrams, the answer is that all owners of jointly owned property must join together to  commence an eviction action.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Greene v. Cabarrus</span>, DN: NHSP-08-098865 (Abrams, J.)</p>
<p>Judge Abrams&#8217; ruling is consistent with Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 47a-23 which requires &#8220;the owner&#8221; to serve a notice to quit. In applying the law to the facts, Judge Abrams reasoned that the legislature could have used the words &#8220;an owner&#8221; and not &#8220;the owner&#8221; in 47a-23.</p>
<p>I think he&#8217;s right. The opinion is consistent with the rules of statutory interpretation.</p>
<p>Other Connecticut Superior Courts are split on this very issue. Making this ripe for appeal. However, appeals in summary process cases are rare. And in this case a check of the judicial branch website indicates that no appeal was filed.</p>
<p><a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=122">I&#8217;ve written about how a different judge reached the opposite outcome on similar facts</a>.</p>
<p>Just another issue to be aware of in the minefield that is Connecticut housing law.</p>
<p>The Connecticut General Assembly should consider clarifying 47a-23 during the next legislative session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/11/if-property-is-owned-jointly-is-the-consent-of-all-owners-required-to-evict-a-tenant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
