<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; ct attorney general</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/tag/ct-attorney-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Blumenthal&#8217;s Google &#8220;Problem&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2012/01/google-thinks-senator-blumenthal-is-still-attorney-general/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2012/01/google-thinks-senator-blumenthal-is-still-attorney-general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general richard blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george jepsen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=3397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum&#8217;s Google &#8220;problem&#8221; has been well documented.  Senator Richard Blumenthal also has a Google &#8220;problem&#8221; (albeit a very different problem than Mr. Santorum). Below my search results for &#8220;ct attorney general&#8221; taken on Monday, January 16, 2012&#8230;.. &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum&#8217;s Google &#8220;problem&#8221; has been well documented.  Senator Richard Blumenthal also has a Google &#8220;problem&#8221; (albeit a very different problem than Mr. Santorum).</p>
<p>Below my search results for &#8220;ct attorney general&#8221; taken on Monday, January 16, 2012&#8230;..</p>
<p><span id="more-3397"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ct-attorney-general.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3398" title="ct attorney general" src="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/ct-attorney-general.png" alt="" width="1007" height="630" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2012/01/google-thinks-senator-blumenthal-is-still-attorney-general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Connecticut&#8217;s Attorney General Have To Be An Attorney?</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/does-connecticuts-attorney-general-have-to-be-an-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/does-connecticuts-attorney-general-have-to-be-an-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan McKeen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Connecticut Law Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random CT Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ct attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dick blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan bysiewicz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ryan McKeen I was asked this question last week and my response was &#8220;I think so, otherwise he or she would be a felon for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law!&#8221; Yeah, I roll with an exciting crowd. &#8230; <a href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/does-connecticuts-attorney-general-have-to-be-an-attorney/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Ryan McKeen</p>
<p>I was asked this question last week and my response was &#8220;I think so, otherwise he or she would be a felon for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law!&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I roll with an exciting crowd.</p>
<p>The question is actually kind of interesting because one does not have to be an attorney to be a justice on the United States Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Anyway conversations like that fuel the fire that is this blog.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8230;The Attorney General shall be an elector of this state and an attorney at law of at least ten years&#8217; active practice at the bar of this state&#8230;.<a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2009/pub/chap035.htm#Sec3-124.htm">Conn.Gen.Stat. Section 3-124</a>.</p>
<p>As is often the case, the answer lies in the statutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/does-connecticuts-attorney-general-have-to-be-an-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

