<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Legal Advice In Court? CT Family Courts Should Promote Lawyer Referral Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Aspell</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Aspell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 04:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7343</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  Free legal vice is worth exactly what you pay for it.  If we devalue ourselves as professionals, we have no one to blame but ourselves when the going rate for our skills falls.  I am a LRS participating attorney and have received 2 separate commedations from the CBA for an exceptional willingness to accept pro bono cases.  I am also a Law Works for People attorney.  There are programs out there for those who truly need it. 

The $25.00 consultation is an excellent program.  It reminds me of Abe Lincolns saying that the purpose of a retainer is so a lawyer knows he has a client, that  the client knows he has a lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  Free legal vice is worth exactly what you pay for it.  If we devalue ourselves as professionals, we have no one to blame but ourselves when the going rate for our skills falls.  I am a LRS participating attorney and have received 2 separate commedations from the CBA for an exceptional willingness to accept pro bono cases.  I am also a Law Works for People attorney.  There are programs out there for those who truly need it. </p>
<p>The $25.00 consultation is an excellent program.  It reminds me of Abe Lincolns saying that the purpose of a retainer is so a lawyer knows he has a client, that  the client knows he has a lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7309</guid>
		<description>Thank you Barbara for both volunteering and sharing your thoughts. Access to justice is a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Barbara for both volunteering and sharing your thoughts. Access to justice is a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara J. Ruhe</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7304</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara J. Ruhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7304</guid>
		<description>I am one of the volunteer lawyers. I think you raise some excellent points.   Most of the folks that I have dealt with are truly lost and don&#039;t know where to turn and have no resources.  I have suggested to folks who need more than 10 minutes of advice to contact the CBA  and have given them that number. I have printed out the page about the HCBA Lawyer Referral Service and will take it with me the next time I volunteer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am one of the volunteer lawyers. I think you raise some excellent points.   Most of the folks that I have dealt with are truly lost and don&#8217;t know where to turn and have no resources.  I have suggested to folks who need more than 10 minutes of advice to contact the CBA  and have given them that number. I have printed out the page about the HCBA Lawyer Referral Service and will take it with me the next time I volunteer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary B. Miller</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7282</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary B. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7282</guid>
		<description>You are correct in every respect. And consider this: avoidance of the expense of litigation is one of the principal reasons that clients settle. If legal advice is free, we become enablers of intractability. Unless truly indigent, the client needs to have an economic investment, however small, in the costs brought about by protraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct in every respect. And consider this: avoidance of the expense of litigation is one of the principal reasons that clients settle. If legal advice is free, we become enablers of intractability. Unless truly indigent, the client needs to have an economic investment, however small, in the costs brought about by protraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re not willing to make a $25 investment towards solving a legal problem than you deserve what you get. Often times when people feel like they have an investment in something of value.

The beautiful thing about the lawyer referral service is that it begins a relationship between a lawyer and a client. Perhaps a client doesn&#039;t want to pay me for the entire case but wants my help drafting a motion - it&#039;s often a win-win for both client and lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not willing to make a $25 investment towards solving a legal problem than you deserve what you get. Often times when people feel like they have an investment in something of value.</p>
<p>The beautiful thing about the lawyer referral service is that it begins a relationship between a lawyer and a client. Perhaps a client doesn&#8217;t want to pay me for the entire case but wants my help drafting a motion &#8211; it&#8217;s often a win-win for both client and lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Michtom</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/07/ct-family-courts-should-promote-lawyer-referral-service/comment-page-1/#comment-7274</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Michtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=2152#comment-7274</guid>
		<description>You have a good point, and $25 is certainly a reasonable amount of money for most people - even my clients, whose incomes are low enough to qualify them for public defender services. One thing to consider, though, is that $25 may present a psychological barrier that keeps people ever from getting the simple advice they need. Understand, I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s right for people to avoid paying even that small sum, but I bet that&#039;s what would happen, because people sometimes can&#039;t believe that legal answers can be so straightforward. As a result, you might still have pro se litigants slowing down the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point, and $25 is certainly a reasonable amount of money for most people &#8211; even my clients, whose incomes are low enough to qualify them for public defender services. One thing to consider, though, is that $25 may present a psychological barrier that keeps people ever from getting the simple advice they need. Understand, I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s right for people to avoid paying even that small sum, but I bet that&#8217;s what would happen, because people sometimes can&#8217;t believe that legal answers can be so straightforward. As a result, you might still have pro se litigants slowing down the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

