<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Connecticut Client Security Fund Fee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/the-connecticut-client-security-fund-fee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/the-connecticut-client-security-fund-fee/</link>
	<description>Connecticut&#039;s Widely Read Obscure Legal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:16:02 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Kantrowitz</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/the-connecticut-client-security-fund-fee/comment-page-1/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Kantrowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1473#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s even worse for those of us who haven&#039;t practiced for 30 years but have to keep forking over the $ for no reason if we don&#039;t want to lose our license.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s even worse for those of us who haven&#8217;t practiced for 30 years but have to keep forking over the $ for no reason if we don&#8217;t want to lose our license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/the-connecticut-client-security-fund-fee/comment-page-1/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1473#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>The fee clearly gets money from lawyers. However it&#039;s a modest price to pay to help further the public&#039;s confidence in the profession and to assist attorneys who are having problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fee clearly gets money from lawyers. However it&#8217;s a modest price to pay to help further the public&#8217;s confidence in the profession and to assist attorneys who are having problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVIDDAPARALEGAL</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/the-connecticut-client-security-fund-fee/comment-page-1/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVIDDAPARALEGAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1473#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>this is just another way to get money from lawyers if the courts are that hungry tell them to have a fudraISER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is just another way to get money from lawyers if the courts are that hungry tell them to have a fudraISER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
