<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Important But 100% Less Sexy Than The Whole Bysiewicz Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Thompson</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>I share your love for Susan Bysiewicz; and have equal respect for the work Oz Griebel has done for Hartford Metro Alliance.  If one of them ends up with their respsctive party nomination, the choice will be easy.  If both do, we have to pay more attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your love for Susan Bysiewicz; and have equal respect for the work Oz Griebel has done for Hartford Metro Alliance.  If one of them ends up with their respsctive party nomination, the choice will be easy.  If both do, we have to pay more attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3301</guid>
		<description>Have you used google scholar? It&#039;s an excellent way to search appellate level decisions for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you used google scholar? It&#8217;s an excellent way to search appellate level decisions for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattB</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>MattB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>Poor wording, look at the time I posted.  I meant the appellate level decisions are at the Judicial Branch website, but only just, since they are arranged by date of publication and not by name or citation, making them almost useless for anyone doing legal research. Also, per Wes Horton the advanced release opinion and the official version can differ, see e.g. Durrant v. Board of Ed, 284 Conn. 91 (2007) and the website version (still up).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor wording, look at the time I posted.  I meant the appellate level decisions are at the Judicial Branch website, but only just, since they are arranged by date of publication and not by name or citation, making them almost useless for anyone doing legal research. Also, per Wes Horton the advanced release opinion and the official version can differ, see e.g. Durrant v. Board of Ed, 284 Conn. 91 (2007) and the website version (still up).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Matt, where can one find the decisions on the website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, where can one find the decisions on the website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattB</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>MattB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  In addition, the decision are on the website, but only barely.  The decisions are unreleased- not formatted for proper citation (and there are cases that have changed from the unreleased to the official versions, if ever so slightly).  It would not be hard to have all of Conn Reports &amp; Conn App up, with correct citation.  The years 2006 unreleased opinions are hard to search and cannot be cited correctly, why leave them up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  In addition, the decision are on the website, but only barely.  The decisions are unreleased- not formatted for proper citation (and there are cases that have changed from the unreleased to the official versions, if ever so slightly).  It would not be hard to have all of Conn Reports &amp; Conn App up, with correct citation.  The years 2006 unreleased opinions are hard to search and cannot be cited correctly, why leave them up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>I would, but the Superior Court decisions aren&#039;t available online for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would, but the Superior Court decisions aren&#8217;t available online for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if you could support your assertion with links and examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if you could support your assertion with links and examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2010/01/more-important-but-100-less-sexy-than-the-bysiewicz-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1477#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>&quot;A Superior Court judge in Connecticut is bound to follow the ruling of a higher court (either the CT Supreme Court or the Appellate Court).  A judge is not compelled to follow an opinion of another superior court judge.&quot;

Looks like you haven&#039;t been engaged in the &quot;active practice&quot; of law either. For every judge who follows precedent, I can show you one who doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Superior Court judge in Connecticut is bound to follow the ruling of a higher court (either the CT Supreme Court or the Appellate Court).  A judge is not compelled to follow an opinion of another superior court judge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Looks like you haven&#8217;t been engaged in the &#8220;active practice&#8221; of law either. For every judge who follows precedent, I can show you one who doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

