<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pain In The Asset: Dividing Pet Medical Expenses In A Divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/09/dividing-pet-medical-expenses-in-a-divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/09/dividing-pet-medical-expenses-in-a-divorce/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kales</title>
		<link>http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2009/09/dividing-pet-medical-expenses-in-a-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=1224#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>It seems a stretch to call future pet costs marital. Isn&#039;t that support for, as you say, property?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a stretch to call future pet costs marital. Isn&#8217;t that support for, as you say, property?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

