http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/same-sex-marriage-in-connecticut-justice-scalia-was-in-part-right/ Fri, 18 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/same-sex-marriage-in-connecticut-justice-scalia-was-in-part-right/comment-page-1/#comment-1376 medlaw Sat, 02 May 2009 16:08:54 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=340#comment-1376 I'm impressed that you debate Constitutional law over beers. Scalia is a strict constructionist except when it disagrees with his agenda--see Bush v. Gore. I very much enjoyed reading of the exercise a Fordham law professor performed on Scalia re, right to privacy. <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/fordham_law_class_collects_scalia_info_justice_is_steamed" target="_blank">http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/fordham_law_clas...</a> Where is the intellectual honesty? I'm impressed that you debate Constitutional law over beers. Scalia is a strict constructionist except when it disagrees with his agenda–see Bush v. Gore. I very much enjoyed reading of the exercise a Fordham law professor performed on Scalia re, right to privacy.
http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/fordham_law_clas…
Where is the intellectual honesty?

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/same-sex-marriage-in-connecticut-justice-scalia-was-in-part-right/comment-page-1/#comment-354 Ten Things to Watch (Besides the Presidential Battle) This Election Day « Politics or Poppycock Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:02:17 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=340#comment-354 [...] be treated as “separate but equal” under the law vanished (even Justice Antonin Scalia agreed with that premise in his fiery dissent) [...] [...] be treated as “separate but equal” under the law vanished (even Justice Antonin Scalia agreed with that premise in his fiery dissent) [...]

]]>