Comments on: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CONNECTICUT: KERRIGAN V. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/ Fri, 18 May 2012 13:52:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: kurye http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-656 kurye Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:18:22 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-656 kurye courierss kurye courierss

]]> By: how to find family history http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-403 how to find family history Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:01:38 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-403 I think this same-sex marriage is purely political in nature and in my opinion, approving this bill does not really lean on the real essence of gay marriages. It is as if like: "Okay, I'll give you a piece of chocolate, even though you are diabetic, as long as you will vote for me and I'll pass a bill that guarantees free medical assistance 100% for diabetic patients like you and even a 100% burial assistance if ever you die from diabetes complications..." I think this same-sex marriage is purely political in nature and in my opinion, approving this bill does not really lean on the real essence of gay marriages. It is as if like: "Okay, I'll give you a piece of chocolate, even though you are diabetic, as long as you will vote for me and I'll pass a bill that guarantees free medical assistance 100% for diabetic patients like you and even a 100% burial assistance if ever you die from diabetes complications…"

]]> By: Same-sex marriage legal in Connecticut | a public defender http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-239 Same-sex marriage legal in Connecticut | a public defender Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:01:00 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-239 [...] A CT Law Blog [...] [...] A CT Law Blog [...]

]]> By: CT Lawyer http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-237 CT Lawyer Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:34:50 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-237 Justice Palmer wrote the opinion, not Justice Borden. Borden wrote a dissent. Justice Palmer wrote the opinion, not Justice Borden. Borden wrote a dissent.

]]> By: Ryan http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-236 Ryan Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:28:28 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-236 What's striking about the opinion is that it is very moving. I'm going to need sometime to digest everything and will probably dedicate all of my posts next week to the opinion. None of this would have been possible without Justice O'Connor in Lawrence v. Texas. What’s striking about the opinion is that it is very moving.

I’m going to need sometime to digest everything and will probably dedicate all of my posts next week to the opinion.

None of this would have been possible without Justice O’Connor in Lawrence v. Texas.

]]> By: Gideon http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Gideon Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:21:50 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-235 I have a long post coming later this evening, but for now: "Yay!" I have a long post coming later this evening, but for now: “Yay!”

]]> By: CT Lawyer http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/plaintiffs-prevail-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-234 CT Lawyer Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:55:01 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=294#comment-234 Amazing. I couldn't be more proud of our Supreme Court and its courage to say, quite simply, that "equal protection means equal protection." I'm still reading the opinion, but it's remarkable. Amazing. I couldn’t be more proud of our Supreme Court and its courage to say, quite simply, that “equal protection means equal protection.” I’m still reading the opinion, but it’s remarkable.

]]>