http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/ Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:21:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-1258 traevsti Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:33:20 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-1258 thank oyu thank oyu

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Gideon Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:49:29 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-253 I figure because these weddings will not be given any recognition on the Federal level, they will be unable to claim they are married for federal purposes. I figure because these weddings will not be given any recognition on the Federal level, they will be unable to claim they are married for federal purposes.

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-251 CT Lawyer Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:19:24 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-251 Gideon, what's your reasoning? Just curious. Gideon, what’s your reasoning? Just curious.

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-245 Gideon Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:32:51 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-245 Cathy - they will still be unable to file as "married" for Federal tax return purposes. Nothing there has changed. Cathy – they will still be unable to file as “married” for Federal tax return purposes. Nothing there has changed.

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-243 Same sex marriage: Does Justice Borden really oppose it? | a public defender Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:30:44 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-243 [...] plaintiffs. Justices Palmer, Norcott, Katz and Judge Harper voting in favor and Justices Borden, Vertefeuille (Ryan takes a stab at unpacking her dissent) and Zarella against. But is that really the vote tally [...] [...] plaintiffs. Justices Palmer, Norcott, Katz and Judge Harper voting in favor and Justices Borden, Vertefeuille (Ryan takes a stab at unpacking her dissent) and Zarella against. But is that really the vote tally [...]

]]> http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2008/10/justice-vertefeuilles-dissent-in-kerrigan/comment-page-1/#comment-242 Cathy Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:07:18 +0000 http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=319#comment-242 Ryan - Here is something to ponder. On a State of Conneticut tax return, same-sex partners that are married will now be able to claim "married". What will happen on the Federal return where this marriage isn't recognized or is it recognized by virtue of Connecticut law? Ryan – Here is something to ponder. On a State of Conneticut tax return, same-sex partners that are married will now be able to claim “married”. What will happen on the Federal return where this marriage isn’t recognized or is it recognized by virtue of Connecticut law?

]]>