Comments on: Fighting Foreclosure In Connecticut Courts

By: Ray Sabb

Ray Sabb — Fri, 14 May 2010 22:04:26 +0000

Well hooray for Judge Satter.
I have Judge Holzberg who has been tolerant of my motions.
But counsel is getting a bit worn thin.

Problem in Connecticut is that you can ask to produce the note and you get an affidavit saying it is lost. Which lends to the object of HOW CAN YOU LOOSE AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT like that. It is laziness. Then you have the argument that the Note follows the Mortgage. In CT that is the way they do it. Then when you ask to see the transfer of ownership that establishes the Plaintiff as to its legal standing you get directed back to a party’s right to discovery and accused of going on a fishing expedition and given cites like Muti v New Haven 24 Conn.Supp. 452,454,194 A2d 447 (1963). HELLO this is 2010. In Connecticut you cannot change the way they do things. YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS. The Banks have all the rights.

Does anyone have a pro bono attorney that will help. Seems all the pro bono’s are not available here in CT.

Ray Sabb
Cromwell, CT
rsabb@comcast.net

By: Edward

Edward — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:24:05 +0000

It's good real story that will provide us real experience in future. lemon law lawyer southern california is providing us a good solution. Thanx

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:34:44 +0000

Foreclosure is the state court judicial process that the bank, mortgage company, finance company, taxing authority or creditor utilizes to repossess your home. Foreclosures generally take three to four months, most commonly ending with a law day or foreclosure by sale. The only certain way to stop a foreclosure is full payment of the arrearage, or the filing of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.
—————————————————
Jennifer

http://www.talkinghomeloans.com

By: Twitter Tweets about foreclosure as of October 17, 2008 | Bay Area REO

Twitter Tweets about foreclosure as of October 17, 2008 | Bay Area REO — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:24:55 +0000

[...] 15:02:30 · Reply · View RyanMcKeen: Fighting Foreclosure In Connecticut Courts http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/?p=379 2008-10-17 14:55:14 · Reply · View foreclosurehome: New blog post: Fundamentals of [...]

By: Ryan

Ryan — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:12:46 +0000

Cases like that are far and few between for all the reasons that you mentioned.

Good for Satter.

By: JDoyon

JDoyon — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:34:54 +0000

It is a beautiful thing to see that lawyer stand up and fight back on behalf of his client. Fortunately for the client, the client had enough funds to retain an attorney, or found an attorney sympathetic to the cause and took the case as a pro bono. Even more refreshing is that Judge Satter ordered the lender to make its officers available for live deposition in Hartford, rather than just rolling over and allowing a video deposition. Unfortunately, cases like these are too few and far in between.